Nan Inc Lawsuit: How Nan Inc Won The Rail-Related Whistleblower Lawsuit

Successful construction companies such as Nan Inc get many lawsuits over the years. Most of them can come from people wanting to make a quick buck from a great company that was built over the years. Receiving a wrongful lawsuit can be an unpleasant part of business. That’s why in this article we want to talk about the multibillion dollar rail related whistleblower lawsuit. Read below to find out all the information you need about this topic.

What do we know about this?

The whistleblower lawsuit ended on Wednesday July 21st, 2021. After a long case, a jury finally ruled in faavor of Nan Inc owner Patrick Shin. This conclusion came after there was no evidence at all that Petricevic had been fired due to his whistleblowing.

That said, the jury also rejected our counterclaim that this employee has put our company and our CEO in a false light. We always work to the best of our abilities, so things like that has hurt us despite doing business in a correcrt manner. Luckily, it has been found that all of these allegations were based on nothing.

About The HART project

HART satands for “Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation” and is responsible for building the 20-mile, 21-station commuter rail system for the City and County of Honolulu. Nan Inc has been part of building this project.

Some of the functions icnclude planning, design, and construction of the fixed guideway system. But also the execution of contracts, labor agreements, and other instruments in order to perform its duties and functions.

Although completion fell behind schedules, and costs continue to rise for this project, we are working to deliver this project like we delivered many other projects. It’s an ambitious project with many different contractors involved so this definitely take time. HART CEO Lori Kahikina has said that it is possible that people will ride the Honolulu rail system by the end of the years. Of course this will be only a part of the total rail system, but it’s a good start that we are extremely excited about.

The Lawsuit in Detail Explained

Despite its many successes, Nan Inc faced a series of legal challenges that shook its foundation. Several lawsuits emerged, each highlighting different facets of the company’s operations:

1. Labor and Employment Disputes: One of the most notable lawsuits involved allegations of labor law violations, with workers accusing the company of unfair labor practices, wage violations, and unsafe working conditions. These claims not only tarnished Nan Inc’s reputation but also raised concerns about worker welfare in the construction industry.

2. Contractual Disputes: Nan Inc’s expansive projects often involved complex contractual arrangements. Disputes over contract breaches, delays, and disagreements on project specifications led to legal battles with both clients and subcontractors. These conflicts illuminated the challenges of managing large-scale construction endeavors.

3. Environmental Concerns: Hawaii’s ecological diversity is a treasure that Nan Inc vowed to preserve. However, the company faced a lawsuit related to environmental violations during a major construction project. This case underscored the delicate balance between development and environmental stewardship.

Luckily, Nan Inc and the owner Patrick Shin prevailed, and currently don’t have any legal issues anymore. Thanks to the help of our team of legal professionals we were able to prove that these claims were false. We couldn’t have done it without them.

Lessons for the Industry: The Nan Inc Saga

The Nan Inc lawsuits offer valuable insights for the construction industry at large:

  1. Ethics Above All: Upholding ethical practices is non-negotiable. By prioritizing fair labor practices and environmental responsibility, construction companies can avoid legal entanglements that tarnish their reputation.
  2. Open Communication: Transparent communication with stakeholders, from workers to clients, is essential. Addressing concerns promptly can prevent minor issues from escalating into legal battles.
  3. Adaptability and Learning: Adversity can be a catalyst for positive change. Embracing challenges, learning from mistakes, and implementing corrective measures demonstrate a company’s commitment to growth.


Nan Inc construction, one of the biggest construction businesses in Hawaii has build a solid name for itself over the last 30 years. All of our team are working very hard to avoid these kind of unfair claims. We will continue to work like this and always serve our customer to the best of our abilities. If you are looking for a construction business, then go to our official website ( for more info.

Company Response: Learning from Adversity

The lawsuits took a toll on Nan Inc, not only financially but also in terms of its reputation. The company’s response to the challenges highlighted its commitment to growth and improvement. It revamped its internal processes, emphasizing transparent communication, stronger compliance with labor laws, and heightened attention to environmental sustainability.

The legal battles served as a turning point for Nan Inc. Rather than succumbing to adversity, the company used the experience to emerge stronger. It not only settled some of the lawsuits amicably but also adopted a proactive approach to addressing potential issues. This involved fostering a culture of integrity, implementing regular compliance audits, and prioritizing sustainable practices.


Other Blog Articles

How Patrick Shin Became Owner Of Hawaii’s Biggest General Construction Company

Our Main Construction Niche

Honouliuli Waste Water Treatment Plant Project